|
Fact about divisibilty by 3(1) The positive integer n is divisible by 3 ⇔ the sum of digits of the positive integer n is divisible by 3. Proof: Let n = d1 + d2101 + ... + dm10m-1 where m is number of digits of number n, and d1 , d2 , ... , dm are its digits. Let S(q) is sum of digits of natural number q, and let n+3 = d'1 + d'2101 + ... + d'm'10m'-1 where m' is number of digits of number n+3, and d'1 , d'2 , ... , d'm' are its digits. In the case where adding 3 to n changes d1 only - we obtain: d'1 = d1+3, d'2 = d2, ... , d'm' = dm, m'=m so S(n+3) = S(n) + 3thus (2) S(n+3) - S(n) = 3 Otherwise - there is arithmetic overflow(s) - let's say up to position k, and obviously 2≤k≤m'. If k=2 then must be: m'=m, d'1=d1-7, d'2=d2+1, d'3=d3, ... , d'm' = dm so S(n+3) = S(n) - 7 + 1 = S(n) - 3⋅2 thus (3) |S(n+3) - S(n)| = 3⋅2 If m'≥k>2 then must be: m≤m'≤m+1, d1≥7, d2=d3= ... =dk-1=9, dk<9 (*) and d'1=d1-7, d'2=d'3= ... =d'k-1=0, d'k=dk+1 (*) so S(n+3) = S(n) -7 - 9(k-2) + 1 = S(n) - 3(3(k-2)+2) = S(n) - 3(3k-4) thus (4) |S(n+3) - S(n)| = 3(3k-4) (*) If m'=m+1 then dm+1 does not exist but without any problems we can assume that dm+1=0. Equations (2), (3) and (4) implicate that S(n) and S(n+3) have identical rests by division by 3. Of course S(1)=1, S(2)=2 and S(3)=3 thus in based on Principle of Mathematical Induction the equipotency (1) is true. ♦Analogically it is possible to prove similar fact about divisibility by 9. Of course, I finally learned (and admire) Gauss's proof, beautifully simple in its simplicity – very intuitive even with a minimal introduction to the world of number theory. Interested readers can easily find it online. ∗∗∗ |